The UNSW Judith Neilson Chair of Contemporary Art (JNCCA) proudly celebrates the recent graduation of two of the Chair’s doctoral students: Nan Li and Jianxiong Jing. Their work brings fresh trans-cultural perspectives to contemporary art criticism and cartography. Nan’s work examines how Chinese contemporary art is interpreted and evaluated in English-speaking contexts, while Jianxiong’s research delves into classical Chinese map-making traditions that challenge Western conceptions of space and cartography. Each of their projects challenges inherited narratives and expands the boundaries of critical inquiry.

Nan Li : Rethinking How East & West Talk About Art

Nan Li’s journey began with a simple observation that unfolded into a deeper, more complex story. By the 1990s, Chinese contemporary art was making waves on the international stage, sparking what many called “China fever.” But as Nan dug deeper into the English-language criticism surrounding this phenomenon, she noticed a significant gap: the conversations happening in Beijing galleries and those occurring in Manhattan art spaces weren't just different – they were operating on entirely different frequencies.

Supported by a China Scholarship Council award, Nan arrived at UNSW in September 2023 as an international Ph.D. exchange student from Beijing Language and Culture University. Her mission? To decode what she would eventually term the "asynchronicity" between Chinese and Western art criticism. This wasn't simply about language barriers or cultural differences – it was about fundamentally different ways of understanding what art means and how it should be discussed.

Working under Professor Paul Gladston's supervision at UNSW, Nan began constructing what she calls a "paradigm map" – not a geographical tool, but a way of visualizing how different critical frameworks collide, compete, and sometimes completely miss each other. Her doctoral dissertation, "Research on Chinese Contemporary Art Criticism in the English-Speaking World (1990–2020): Focusing on the US, the UK, and Australia," explores how Chinese contemporary art is interpreted in English-speaking countries, revealing how meaning is shaped and transformed across cultures.

What emerges is a deeper divide, as Nan discovers that this isn't just about delayed reactions or simple misunderstandings. Western critics in the 1990s often dismissed Chinese contemporary art as derivative or secondary, while Chinese critics were developing entirely different vocabularies for discussing contemporaneity itself. The two critical traditions weren't just out of sync – they were asking essentially different questions.

Nan's year at UNSW proved transformative, not just for the access to English-language resources difficult to obtain in China, but for the intellectual dialogue with Professor Gladston, whose deconstructive approach helped her see the productive tensions between theory and practice, tradition and modernity, East and West. Now, as she begins her new position as a lecturer at a university in Shanghai, Nan carries with her a toolkit for helping future scholars navigate these complex cross-cultural conversations.

  • What initially inspired you to examine Chinese contemporary art criticism through the lens of English-speaking contexts, and why do you think this perspective is important?

    "I think it is necessary to briefly trace the development of Chinese contemporary art and its (westernized) criticism within English world. Since the 1990s, Chinese contemporary artists have increasingly engaged with the global art system through active participation in international exhibitions. Current studies on Chinese contemporary art criticism in English-speaking contexts are usually fragmented – often limited to topical discussions or specific case analyses. These studies lack a holistic and systematic understanding of the field. These gaps and limitations have motivated my decision to explore Chinese contemporary art criticism from the perspective of the English-speaking world, with the aim of contributing to a more integrated and culturally sensitive critical discourse."


    What advice would you give early-career researchers seeking to engage with global academic discourse while maintaining a strong connection to local perspectives?

    "My advice would be to embrace a culturally inclusive mindset rather than single 'solid' idea when engaging with global academic discourse... Local perspectives should not be treated as secondary or 'case studies' of larger global theories. Instead, researchers should explore how local histories, practices, and ways of knowing can inform, challenge, or even reshape dominant academic paradigms. Ultimately, I would encourage young researchers to view themselves not only as knowledge consumers but also as active producers who can contribute original perspectives to global conversations."


    You recently started a new position – congratulations! Can you tell us about your new role and what your current work focuses on?

    “I recently received an exciting offer from a university in Shanghai. As part of my plans as a lecturer, I would like to continue developing my research on cultural criticism from a cross-cultural perspective, with a particular focus on contemporary Chinese art and its global reception. In addition, I also hope to inspire students to think critically about the relationship between art, culture, and society – both within China and beyond. I am especially interested in integrating local cultural resources with global perspectives in my teaching, encouraging students to become reflective and globally minded thinkers. Looking ahead, I plan to further expand my research into the transnational circulation of Chinese contemporary art. I also look forward to collaborating with scholars and institutions both in China and globally to promote more inclusive and dialogic approaches to art criticism.”

Jianxiong Jing : Decolonizing Maps Through Ancient Wisdom

In 2018, Jianxiong Jing encountered something that would change the trajectory of his academic life: a classical Chinese map that he realised he couldn’t fully understand using modern cartographic concepts. Yet somehow, impossibly, it had guided countless travellers and shaped imperial decisions for centuries. Jianxiong could have simply shrugged and moved on, chalking up his confusion to the mysteries of ancient Chinese culture. Instead, he became fascinated. How could something so "wrong" have been so right?

This moment of bewilderment set Jianxiong on a long intellectual journey across centuries, one that challenged his assumptions about how humans conceptualise and represent space. Jianxiong received an International Postgraduate Award and was supervised by Professor Paul Gladston, Dr. Marnie Feneley, and Dr. Ian McArthur at UNSW as he undertook his Ph.D. dissertation: "Decolonizing Cartography: A Multi-modal Analysis of Classical Chinese Map-making and its Critical Relevance to Contemporary Representations of Space."

The mystery deepened as Jianxiong discovered that classical Chinese maps from the Ming and Qing periods weren't trying to be "accurate" in the Western scientific sense at all. They were doing something far more sophisticated: embedding Confucian literati cultural and aesthetic frameworks directly into spatial representation. These weren't failed attempts at scientific mapping – they were successful attempts at something entirely different.

Using social semiotics and discourse analysis, Jianxiong began to crack the code. These maps were simultaneously practical navigation tools, philosophical statements, and aesthetic objects. They represented space not as neutral territory to be measured and controlled, but as culturally meaningful landscape shaped by historical relationships, ethical considerations, and aesthetic values.

The breakthrough came when Jing realized these weren't just historical curiosities – they were blueprints for what he calls "post-West" cartography. In an era when China is developing independent knowledge systems across various fields, these traditional approaches offer alternatives to Western spatial epistemologies. They suggest ways of mapping that don't just show where things are, but what they mean and how they relate to human experience.

After successfully defending his thesis in June 2024, Jianxiong describes his doctoral work as only "preliminary explorations" of a vast research territory. His next steps involve deepening these findings and producing what promises to be a series of papers and monographs that could reshape how we think about maps, space, and cultural knowledge systems.

  • How did the co-supervision arrangement with Professor Paul Gladston, Dr. Marnie Feneley, and Dr. Ian McArthur support and influence your research?

    “Paul encouraged deep critical thinking, which has profoundly shaped my intellectual approach and will continue to influence me throughout my life. Marnie emphasized close engagement with primary sources, insisting that I examine them firsthand – making my research more vivid and grounded. Ian was an incredibly supportive mentor who helped me refine many important details.” 


    What advice would you give to future PhD students researching cross-cultural or art criticism topics at UNSW?

    “For students without a prior background in art criticism, I would offer two pieces of advice: First, rigorously study the reading lists provided by supervisors to build a solid critical foundation. Second, when supervisors suggest new research perspectives, take the initiative to explore relevant literature and tackle challenges independently – supervisors are there to assess feasibility and suggest improvements – not to solve every problem for you.”


    What are your next steps now that you’ve completed your PhD? Any new projects building on your research?

    “This is a vast research project, and due to time constraints during my PhD, I was only able to conduct preliminary explorations. Moving forward, I plan to deepen my doctoral research, further develop my findings, and produce a series of papers and monographs.”

Stay up to date

Join the mailing list of the UNSW Judith Neilson Chair of Contemporary Art to receive the latest news, events, and opportunities.

Looking Ahead

As Nan Li and Jianxiong Jing take their next steps beyond UNSW, their work serves as a powerful reminder of how cross-cultural research can reshape the ways we think about art, space, and knowledge. Both scholars have challenged dominant paradigms—not simply by critiquing them, but by offering alternative frameworks grounded in local histories and global dialogues.

The UNSW Judith Neilson Chair of Contemporary Art celebrates their achievements and looks forward to seeing how their evolving work continues to inspire new conversations across cultures.