About

What is the LOFA Study?

Personalise
word cloud blue green orange

People who have lived in child welfare institutions and other substitute care as children are known to have suffered significant disadvantage over the course of their lives. This research will build knowledge about the range of experiences and outcomes for those who were in institutions and other forms of ‘care’ by asking care leavers themselves about their experiences and how these have affected their lives –physically, emotionally and psychologically. It will identify critical points in care leavers’ lives, and events that have contributed to the development of both positive and negative life outcomes. It will endeavour to contribute to enhancement of service provision to the thousands of Australians who were placed in ‘homes’ as children, with a particular emphasis on what their current circumstances and services they now need, as adults.

Download our recent reports.

The LOFA Study

  • This research is situated in a human rights-based approach, with due recognition that ‘children have the right to protection from violence, abuse and neglect, and from being hurt or mistreated, physically or mentally’ (United Nations - Article 19, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989).  Adult care leavers require access to services to assist them in overcoming or coping with the effects of any abuse they may have suffered as children and redress. The research involves collecting data on the lived experiences of Forgotten Australians. Broadly there are three groups targeted by the research: child migrants (primarily from the UK), children who were placed in institutional care for a variety of reasons, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander persons who were removed from their families (the members of the  ‘Stolen Generations’). The research will enhance knowledge about the ‘Forgotten Australians’ who lived in care during the last century in Australia and provide a knowledge base for developing responsive services to improve their current and future health and wellbeing, based on their self reported needs. Building knowledge about life trajectories of this population, identifying resilience factors and coping mechanisms, and gaining insight into transitioning service factors in the post care experience would be extremely helpful in responding to children who are currently in care and will transition out of care in the future.

  • The research takes both a statistical and narrative approach. A comprehensive survey seeks to ascertain and quantify the effects that being in ‘care’ had on care-leavers over the course of their lives. The surveys are available online, on paper and can also be completed over the telephone.  Interviews and focus groups allow people to discuss their experiences in their own words, and describe the range of experiences and effects that being in a children’s institution or other forms of care had on them. Importantly, this allows people to tell their own story either individually or in the company of other care leavers, and to comment on current policy issues such as unmet needs or service inequities or barriers to services that affect them as adults. Further, participants are provided with the opportunity to  discuss current inquiries into institutionalised abuse, what the various  formal ‘apologies’ mean to them both emotionally and materially and other issues of concern. Focus groups and interviews are taking place in a variety of capital cities and regional areas throughout Australia, to attempt to maximise participation and gain a national perspective.

  • Overseas and Australian studies document widespread practices in many care institutions that were physically, psychologically and sexually abusive or that constituted neglect (McKenzie, 2003; Mendes, 2005; Penglase, 2005; Sigal, Rossignol, & Perry, 1999). The experiences of children in Australian care systems have been documented in autobiographical accounts such as personal submissions to the Australian Parliament’s Senate Inquiry into Children in Institutional Care and its report ‘Forgotten Australians: A Report on Australians Who Experienced Institutional or Out of Home Care as Children’ (Senate Community Affairs References Committee, 2004) and various State investigations (Forde Inquiry, 1999; Ombudsman, Tasmania, 2006). The Care Leavers Australia Network (CLAN) surveys of its members indicate that abuse, harsh punishment and sexual molestation were reported to be common experiences, and the majority of respondents reported that their lives were impacted by complex mental health issues (CLAN, 2007; CLAN 2011).

    Currently, national concern about how children were treated whilst in ‘care’ has culminated in the current Australian Government’s Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, particularly in relation to organisations with responsibility for children in their care.

    The issues facing Forgotten Australians, Care Leavers, the Stolen Generations and Child Migrants continue to be the subject of further research and commentary to enhance community awareness and mobilise remedial action, policy intervention and redress.

How the study was designed

  • This research aimed to explore life experiences of ‘care’ leavers who have lived in institutions (such as children’s Homes and orphanages) or other forms of out-of-home care as children. Participants in this study were drawn from the larger cohort of those who were in care between 1930 and 1989 and included three sub-cohorts: Forgotten Australians, former Child Migrants and members of the Stolen Generations. The specific aims of this research were to:

    1. Explore patterns of older care leavers’ experiences and life trajectories in care and post care.
    2. Identify their current unmet needs and ways to support them.
    3. Identify factors in their past or present experiences that tend to be protective or accentuate risks.
    4. Assess ways in which support from professionals, families and friends help them to achieve positive outcomes.
    5. Apply learnings to contemporary out-of-home care and after care to enhance favourable life outcomes and transition services.
  • The research employed a mixture of quantitative and qualitative methods. It included three components: surveys, interviews, and focus groups. Quantitative surveys were conducted to collect information from a broad sample and qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted to gather in-depth and contextualised information.

  • The target population of this study was ‘care leavers’ who have lived in child welfare institutions and other substitute care as children during the period of 1930–1989. This included Forgotten Australians, former Child Migrants and members of the Stolen Generations, as well as younger adult Aboriginal persons taken into ‘care’ after 1955.

    The research project aimed to recruit ‘hard-to reach’ care survivors as well as ‘self-identified’ participants who were contactable through existing networks. A media campaign and launch was used to publicise the study. Although there were many organisations that support care leavers, it was believed that a considerable proportion were not in contact with these organisations. Therefore, a broad approach was taken including promoting the study in the media and some selected advertising. Major recruitment was also achieved through research partners and their service network (in particular the Find and Connect services in each State and Territory and other specialised services such as Tuart Place in Western Australia), Child Migrant organisations, and national peak bodies such as CLAN (Care Leavers Australia Network) the Alliance for Forgotten Australians, Families Australia and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander national peak bodies were contacted. Also contacted were previous care providers (e.g., NGOs/statutory welfare organisations). In addition, organisations with specific reach into difficult to access populations were used to target potential participants who do not usually identify as having been in care. Finally, a number of administrators, service providers and advocates who work with adult care leavers participated in the study as specialist participants.

  • Ethics approvals were obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committees at the University of New South Wales, Relationships Australia (NSW), and Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of NSW. The purposes and procedures of the study were clearly explained to all participants and informed consent was obtained prior to their participation. Participants were also informed that they were able to withdraw from the study at any time. Great care was taken to protect privacy and confidentiality. Surveys were completed anonymously online and mail out. The personal information obtained in the course of the study has been handled by UNSW in full compliance with privacy law, UNSW policies, and the conditions of the Ethics committee approval for the study. Participants in interviews and focus groups were assigned pseudonyms. In case of reporting sensitive information, some minor details were modified to protect identities. No identifiable information was included in any reports or manuscripts emanating from this study. Given the small number of participants in some states and territories, all analyses were conducted at the national level to protect confidentiality. All participants in focus groups and interviews were offered a small payment to cover their travel expenses and to acknowledge their time and effort. Participants were given the contact details of researchers and support services in case of experiencing psychological distress derived from the participation in this study. There was no such incident reported to the research team.

  • Surveys were conducted from December 11, 2014 to March 31, 2016. The survey was delivered in three ways:

    • Online: Participants visited the project website and clicked on a button to access the survey.
    • On paper: The survey was made available through mail out, and included a postage paid return envelope.
    • Over the telephone: The survey could be completed over the phone, by a research staff member administering the survey verbally with a participant.

    When participants directly contacted researchers for paper or telephone surveys, they received a long version of the survey. In the case of telephone surveys, a researcher made a telephone call at the time agreed by participants. When participants completed online surveys, at the end of the short form, they were asked whether they would like to continue the long form online or complete it on paper or over the telephone. When participants opted for the completion on paper or over the telephone, they received the long form by mail and, for the telephone completion, a researcher made a telephone call at the time agreed by participants.

  • Interviews usually ran for 45 minutes to 1 hour 15 minutes; however some went for longer (up to three hours). With the permission of participants, interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Focus groups usually involved 4–8 people with the optimum number being 5 persons and typically ran for 1.5 hours. Focus groups were mainly mixed groups involving different cohorts of care leavers. Some focus groups included Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal participants and some focus groups involved Aboriginal participants only (where these were organised through an Aboriginal specific service). Typically, a UNSW researcher facilitated the focus groups alone. For groups of Aboriginal care leavers, an Aboriginal co-facilitator attended and co-facilitated. The option was also given to outsource facilitation where culturally appropriate and requested. In total, 20 focus groups were conducted. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed with the permission of participants.

  • Participants were asked about:

    • Experiences in care and challenges confronted.
    • Experiences of transitioning out of care.
    • Life outcomes after care – education, work, health, wellbeing, relationships, social support.
    • Perceptions of their current service needs, and how care-systems can be improved for children and young people in the future.
  • Research highlights were communicated by a range of means in suitably accessible forms to participants in the study and service providers through summaries of research findings, participant and partners’ newsletters, and web pages. To benefit others who might be interested in this research and use findings for advocacy, results were compiled into a detailed research report and an executive summary of key findings of the research report was launched at a public event at the University of New South Wales on 12 December by the Hon Brad Hazzard, Minister for Family and Community Services and for Social Housing, Ms Robynne Quiggin, Deputy Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner and Professor Mark Courtney, University of Chicago.

Contact us

If you have any questions about the study, please get in touch.

Professor Elizabeth Fernandez

Associate Professor Jung-Sook Lee

Paul-Auguste Comefert